As a Committed Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Top Solution for American Health System
Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.
Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.
Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly
Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.
Currently the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.
When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.
How Universal Coverage Would Work
A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.
Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.
Implementation in the US
In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.
Advantages for Small Businesses
Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).
It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.
Considering Challenges
Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.
Need for Realistic Evaluation
As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.